|
Board
Members in Attendance
|
Phil
Maroney, Chair
|
Jason McGuirk
|
|
Dennis
Bayer |
Chris
Schlageter |
|
Gerald
Fieser |
Wanda
Van Dam |
|
Anne
Hallum |
John E.
Wagner |
|
Dwight
Lewis |
|
Also
in Attendance |
|
Douglas M. Weaver
Rob Walsh
Randall Sleister
Stacey J. Manning
Jeanette Munson
Bonnie Cary
Stuart Jones
Marshall Hoerl |
Steve Oxier
Alan Alshouse
Mary Stoughton
Tammy Owens
Chrissy Peterson
W. S. Walkup
Clay Veino |
Meeting Called to Order
Phil Maroney, Chair, welcomed all those in attendance (i.e.,
Committee Members, County staff and the Public), and called the
meeting to order at 3:30p.m.
Roll Call
Phil Maroney, Chair, instructed the Recording Secretary to record
the roll of the Members in attendance, in which nine (9) Members
were present.
Introduction of Field Staff
Rob Walsh stated that County staff deemed it important to introduce
two (2) key members of the Land Acquisition and Management
Division’s field staff to the Committee. He introduced Stuart Jones,
who is the Land Manager in charge of supervising the land management
field staff and a certified forester, and Bonnie Cary, who is the
Educational Outreach Coordinator in charge of holding various
classes that educate the public about our conservation lands.
County staff encouraged the Committee to attend some of the
educational outreach classes.
Recognition of Former Members
Chair Phil Maroney explained that County staff had a Certificate of
Appreciation to present to former Committee Members Reid Hughes,
JoAnn O’Bannon, Alan Long and Alan Alshouse for their contribution
as members. However, Members Reid Hughes, JoAnn O’Bannon, and Alan
Long were not available to attend this meeting to accept the
certificate. County staff intends on delivering the Certificate of
Appreciations to these Members. Former Member Alan Alshouse was
present to receive a Certificate of Appreciation for his outstanding
and dedicated service to the Committee from January 10, 2002 until
March 31, 2007.
Election of Chair and Vice-Chair
Rob Walsh explained that in accordance with Resolution 2007-79 and
the Committee’s By Laws, the Committee shall annually elect a Chair
and Vice-Chair. He further explained that the current Chair, Phil
Maroney, could not be re-elected as he has served two (2) one-year
terms. He also explained that the position of Vice-Chair was vacant
as Member Alan Alshouse, who had served as the Vice-Chair, was not
re appointed by County Council for the 2007-2009 term.
Member Dwight Lewis requested clarification on the “term limits” of
the Chair and Vice-Chair.
Rob Walsh explained that the Committee’s By-Laws state that “such
officers may be re-elected at the discretion of the Committee, but
shall not serve more than two (2) consecutive years.” Therefore,
Chair Phil Maroney could not be re-elected as Chair for this year.
However, he could be elected at some time in the future as the
election of Chair and Vice-Chair occurs annually.
Chair Phil Maroney called for nominations of the Chair.
Member Dwight Lewis nominated Member Dennis Bayer, and Member Wanda
Van Dam nominated Member Dwight Lewis.
Member John E. Wagner moved that the nominations for Chair to be
closed.
Hearing no opposition, Chair Phil Maroney declared the nominations
for Chair as closed.
Member Dwight Lewis respectfully withdrew his nomination by Member
Wanda Van Dam for Chair.
With no additional nominations Member Dennis Bayer was elected as
Chair by a unanimous voice vote.
Rob Walsh presented a plaque to Chair Phil Maroney in grateful
appreciation for his “Outstanding and Dedicated Service” as Chair
from April 20, 2005 until July 18, 2007.
Chair Phil Maroney relinquished control of the meeting to the newly
elected Chair, Member Dennis Bayer.
Chair Dennis Bayer called for nominations of the Vice-Chair.
Member Jason McGuirk nominated Member Anne Hallum.
Member John E. Wagner moved that the nominations for Vice-Chair to
be closed. Member Phil Maroney seconded the motion.
With no additional nominations Member Anne Hallum was elected as
Vice-Chair by a unanimous voice vote.
Discussion and Approval of the 2007 Work
Plan – Rob Walsh stated that, per Resolution 2007 79, the
Committee is required to conduct an annual goal setting session
where it outlines its work plan for the year. He reviewed the
proposed goals for 2007, which included the Committee’s requirement
to conduct at least two (2) meetings to determine the eligibility of
properties submitted to the Volusia Forever Program, and at least
two (2) meetings to rank the properties that were determined as
eligible for further consideration under the Volusia Forever
Program. He added that after the Committee conducts its ranking
meeting, their approved ranking summary is then submitted to County
Council for approval. County Council’s approval then authorizes
County staff to begin the acquisition process of the properties on
the Group “A” List.
Member John E. Wagner made a motion to approve the Committee’s 2007
Work Plan, as presented. Member Dwight Lewis seconded the motion
that carried by unanimous voice vote.
Stacey Manning stated that the cover page should be amended to
reflect the name of the newly elected Chair Dennis Bayer.
Discussion and Determination of Eligibility
for Submitted Applications
Rob Walsh explained that the Committee would be reviewing eight (8)
properties that had been submitted for the 1st Cycle of 2007, and
determining whether the properties are eligible for further
consideration under the Volusia Forever Program. He added that
County staff had not visited the properties, and the Initial Review
Report had been produced based on information provided by the
applicant. He reminded the Committee that Resolution 2004-80 states
that a property should meet at least four (4) of the Primary
Criteria, and is required to have an affirmative vote of at least
five (5) Members in order for it to be determined as eligible. At
the September 19, 2007, Committee meeting, the properties that have
been determined as eligible would be presented to the Committee
again for ranking. County staff would provide a more detailed
ranking report and presentation to assist the Committee with the
ranking determinations.
1. Ridgewood Avenue/Owen Property – Rob Walsh provided a
location map and the following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 1.65 acres in size consisting of one (1)
undeveloped parcel;
b. it is located on U.S. 1 in the New Smyrna Beach area;
c. the southern boundary is adjacent to Doris Leeper Spruce Creek
Preserve;
d. the northern boundary is adjacent to development (i.e., mobile
home park, and single family residential dwellings), and;
e. it meets five (5) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Rob Walsh added that this property could become an addition to the
boundaries of Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve.
Member Gerald Fieser asked if the property consists of uplands, or
wetlands.
Randall Sleister replied that the property consists of uplands.
Member John E. Wagner stated that the property meets nine (9) of the
22 Site Ranking Criteria.
Member Phil Maroney asked what zoning classification was assigned to
this property.
Rob Walsh stated that the property was assigned the zoning
classification of Vacant Commercial.
Member Dwight Lewis asked if the property had recently been rezoned.
Tammy Owens, property owner, was present to provide additional
information and to answer any questions. She responded that the
property has been and is currently zoned as B-4. However, it is
adjacent to lands that were recently rezoned to Conservation.
Rob Walsh added that the adjacent property recently rezoned as
Conservation is the Bayou Bay Property.
Tammy Owens stated that this property could provide additional green
space for the area, and offer educational and passive recreational
opportunities, which could include nature trails.
Discussion ensued regarding the property located along the eastern
boundary of this property and the potential application to the
Volusia Forever Program.
Member John E. Wagner added that Harbour Road was old U.S. Hwy. 1,
which contains the old vestiges of the wooden bridge at the northern
end.
Member Anne Hallum made a motion to accept the Ridgewood Avenue/Owen
Property Application as an eligible project. Member John E. Wagner
seconded the motion that carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Rob Walsh stated that the Walkup and Four Star Timber, Inc.
properties were two (2) separate applications, but would be reviewed
and discussed together as they are contiguous to each other.
2. Walkup Property -Rob Walsh provided a location map and the
following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 101 acres in size consisting of one (1)
undeveloped parcel;
b. the southern boundary is adjacent to the Four Star Timber
Property, which is being reviewed for determination of eligibility;
c. the northern boundary is adjacent to public lands owned by the
St. Johns River Water Management District;
d. this application was generated by County staff contacting the
property owner in an effort to add acreage to existing conservation
lands;
e. it consists of wetland swamp and uplands (i.e., pine plantation
and pasture);
f. it is within the Haw Creek Basin; and
g. it meets eight (8) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member John E. Wagner stated that this property meets thirteen (13)
of the 22 Site Ranking Criteria.
Discussion ensued regarding the potential for acquiring the parcel
that adjoins this property’s eastern boundary, which would provide
connectivity to other conservation lands and access.
Discussion ensued regarding the property’s appeal after Member Phil
Maroney asked if it would be less desirable without the Four Star
Timber, Inc. Property.
Douglas Weaver replied that this property would be less desirable
without the Four Star Timber, Inc. Property.
Rob Walsh added that the Four Star Timber Property is used for
silviculture and not slated for development.
Member Phil Maroney pointed out that access to this property could
be an issue because the Four Star Timber, Inc. Property is being
offered as a conservation easement, which typically doesn’t allow
public access.
Discussion ensued regarding the differences between a conservation
easement and a fee simple acquisition after Chair Dennis Bayer asked
County staff to provide a brief explanation on the differences.
Rob Walsh explained that a conservation easement allows the property
owner to retain ownership of the underlying fee and continue with
the management responsibilities. He added that the property owners
would be allowed to continue with the current uses, but would not be
allowed to develop the property by constructing the number of homes
that its zoning classification would allow. He noted that a
conservation easement is the acquisition of a property’s development
rights. A conservation easement can cost much less than a fee simple
acquisition, which could be between 20% and 80% of the dollar value.
Douglas Weaver added that the terms of a conservation easement are
negotiated to determine if a single family dwelling would be allowed
as the overall goal is conservation of the natural resource.
Member John E. Wagner asked if public access is allowed on
properties that have a conservation easement.
Rob Walsh replied that typically public access is not allowed on
properties that have a conservation easement.
Member John E. Wagner made a motion to accept the Walkup Property
Application as an eligible project. Member Jason McGuirk seconded
the motion that carried by a vote of eight (8) to one (1) with
Member Anne Hallum opposed.
3. Four Star Timber, Inc. Property - Rob Walsh provided a
location map and the following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 96 acres in size consisting of one (1)
undeveloped parcel;
b. the eastern boundary is adjacent to other conservation lands
(i.e., Timberlands Consolidated);
c. the northern boundary is adjacent to the Walkup Property, which
is being reviewed for eligibility determination for the 1st cycle of
2007;
d. this application was generated by County staff contacting the
property owner in an effort to add acreage to existing conservation
lands;
e. this proposal is for a conservation easement;
f. it is used as part of a timber operation that has been recognized
by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) for
cooperative forestry assistance and best management practices;
g. it primarily consists of pine plantation;
h. it is within the Haw Creek Basin, and;
i. it meets five (5) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member John E. Wagner stated that this property meets seven (7) of
the 22 Site Ranking Criteria and it is contiguous to other
conservation lands.
Member Phil Maroney made a motion to accept the Four Star Timber,
Inc. Property Application as an eligible project. Member Wanda Van
Dam seconded the motion that carried by a vote of eight (8) to one
(1) with Member John E. Wagner opposed.
4. Barbara Miller, et al Properties - Rob Walsh explained
that these properties are part of two (2) different antiquated
subdivisions that were platted in 1925.
a. Davis Park - Rob Walsh provided a location map and the following
information about this property:
1) it is approximately 8.85 acres in size consisting of nine (9)
parcels that were platted into 50’ x 100’ lots;
2) it is located in the Lake Helen area;
3) there is no infrastructure, utilities, or roads;
4) the current zoning requires one (1) acre minimum parcel size;
5) it primarily consists of scrub habitat;
6) locating a funding partner would be problematic; and
7) it meets four (4) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Discussion ensued regarding the development potential of the Davis
Park and Lake Beresford Heights subdivisions.
Randall Sleister added that the County would not issue building
permits for either subdivision because there is no infrastructure,
utilities or roads.
Discussion ensued regarding why the Davis Park and Lake Beresford
Heights properties were not referred to the Small Lot Acquisition
Program.
Rob Walsh explained that the Small Lot Acquisition Program was
created to purchase environmentally sensitive properties in
antiquated paper platted subdivisions (i.e., University Highlands,
Cape Atlantic Estate), which are typically purchased for the
assessed value. Since the assessed values of the properties in Davis
Park and Lake Beresford Heights are significantly higher and would
be higher than the monies set aside for the Small Lot Acquisition
Program, these properties were referred to the Volusia Forever
Program.
Douglas Weaver added that the Small Lot Acquisition Program would be
a long term effort to create larger tracts of contiguous lands for
protection of the natural resource and provide wildlife corridors.
Randall Sleister added that Davis Park was one of the first
antiquated subdivisions where County staff attempted to contact the
property owners to participate in the Small Lot Acquisition Program.
County staff was not very successful with this first attempt.
Chair Dennis Bayer asked if the habitat would be suitable for scrub
jays.
Randall Sleister explained that these properties could be suitable
habitat for scrub jays with some restoration.
Discussion ensued regarding the issues associated with the
management of these smaller properties.
Randall Sleister stated that County staff was not managing these
smaller properties until enough contiguous pieces are assembled to
create one large tract.
Members Chris Schlageter and Anne Hallum suggested that County staff
contact the property owners again to discuss the Small Lot
Acquisition Program and their asking price.
Member Phil Maroney noted the following issues with the Lake
Beresford Heights and Davis Park properties: 1) meets the minimum
ranking criteria, 2) unlikely to find a funding partner, 3) small
size, 4) no access, and 4) not cost effective to manage.
Member Gerald Fieser asked if the development of these subdivisions
was hindered by the County owning parcels throughout the
subdivisions.
Douglas Weaver responded that development of these subdivisions
would be hindered by the current zoning regulations, and the costs
associated with their development (i.e., roads, stormwater). He
added that another hindrance would be that these parcels are owned
by a multitude of owners.
Member John E. Wagner made a motion to accept the Barbara Miller, et
al (Davis Park) Property Application as an eligible project. Member
Dwight Lewis seconded the motion that failed by a roll call vote of
zero (0) to nine (9), as Resolution 2004 80 requires an affirmative
vote of at least five (5) Members to pass.
b. Lake Beresford Heights - Rob Walsh provided a location map
and the following information about this property:
1) it is approximately 3.25 acres in size consisting of 27 parcels;
2) it primarily consists of scrub habitat;
3) the current zoning requires a minimum of five (5) acres to allow
a building permit to be issued;
4) locating a funding partner would be problematic; and
5) it meets four (4) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member John E. Wagner made a motion to accept the Barbara Miller, et
al (Lake Beresford Heights) Property Application as an eligible
project. Member Phil Maroney seconded the motion that failed by a
roll call vote of zero (0) to nine (9), as Resolution 2004 80
requires an affirmative vote of at least five (5) Members to pass.
5. Smith Trust Property - Rob Walsh provided a location map
and the following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 337 acres in size consisting of four (4)
parcels located off Nine Mile Point Road near the Town of Pierson;
b. it is an in-holding of the Lake George Conservation Area;
c. it completes acquisitions begun under previous land acquisition
programs;
d. this proposal is for a conservation easement;
e. it is zoned Resource Corridor (RC) and Forestry (F); and
f. it meets six (6) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member Phil Maroney asked for clarification regarding access as this
proposal is for a conservation easement and the Initial Review
Report indicates that there is appropriate access to the property.
Rob Walsh explained that there is access to the property from Nine
Mile Point Road, but there typically would not be public access
because of the conservation easement.
Member Anne Hallum asked what type of activities and/or structures
would be permitted on this property because of the proposed
conservation easement.
Rob Walsh responded that the terms of the conservation easement have
not been discussed, but would be after the property has been
determined as eligible and ranked as a Group A List property.
Member Dwight Lewis added that the property owners were exploring
their financial options.
Member Dwight Lewis made a motion to accept the Smith Trust Property
Application as an eligible project. Member Jason McGuirk seconded
the motion that carried by a unanimous voice vote.
Rob Walsh stated that the Veino Cattle Ranch and Peterson properties
were two (2) separate applications, but would be reviewed and
discussed together as they are contiguous to each other.
6. Veino Cattle Ranch Property - Rob Walsh provided a
location map and the following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 115 acres in size consisting of seven (7)
parcels located off Prideaux Road in the Osteen area;
b. this proposal is for a conservation easement;
c. it is part of a cattle operation;
d. it consists primarily of pasture areas;
e. it is adjacent to the County’s Wiregrass Prairie Preserve; and
f. it meets five (5) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member Phil Maroney noted that the Veino Cattle Ranch and Peterson
properties primarily consist of pasture areas, and asked if these
acquisitions would enhance the County’s Wiregrass Prairie Preserve.
Douglas Weaver responded that these acquisitions could provide a
benefit to the County’s Wiregrass Prairie Preserve by preventing
development of this area.
Discussion ensued regarding the potential termination of a
conservation easement if the property is sold to another party.
Douglas Weaver explained that a conservation easement would be held
in perpetuity.
Randall Sleister added that one of the terms of the conservation
easement is that the County would reserve the right of first refusal
if the owners wanted to sell the property.
Member John E. Wagner noted that the Initial Review Reports for the
Veino Cattle Ranch and Peterson properties were identical.
Discussion ensued regarding the need to keep the Veino Cattle Ranch
and Peterson properties together as a project, and how these
properties offer benefits by expanding the boundaries of Wiregrass
Prairie Preserve.
Member Gerald Fieser made a motion to accept the Veino Cattle Ranch
Property Application as an eligible project. Member Dwight Lewis
seconded the motion that carried by a vote of seven (7) to two (2)
with Members Anne Hallum and Phil Maroney opposed.
7. Peterson Property - Rob Walsh provided a location map and
the following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 46 acres in size consisting of four (4)
parcels located off Prideaux Road in the Osteen area;
b. this proposal is for a conservation easement;
c. it is part of a cattle operation;
d. it consists primarily of pasture areas;
e. it is not adjacent to the County’s Wiregrass Prairie Preserve,
but it is adjacent to the Veino Cattle Ranch Property; and
f. it meets five (5) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member Gerald Fieser made a motion to accept the Peterson Property
Application as an eligible project. Member Jason McGuirk seconded
the motion that carried by a vote of seven (7) to two (2) with
Members Anne Hallum and Phil Maroney opposed.
8. SR 40 Middle Haw Creek Property - Rob Walsh provided a
location map and the following information about this property:
a. it is approximately 47 acres in size consisting of one (1)
undeveloped parcel located on SR 40 near the City of Ormond Beach;
b. it offers protection of Middle Haw Creek, which runs along the
western boundary;
c. there would be management issues due to its location on SR 40 and
surrounding large lot development;
d. it is near public lands (i.e., Relay Wildlife Management Area of
Flagler County), but it is not adjacent;
e. it consists of 30 acres of wetlands and 17 acres of pine forest;
and
f. it meets four (4) of the 13 Primary Ranking Criteria.
Member Jason McGuirk expressed a concern regarding the protection of
Middle Haw Creek as the surrounding area is being developed.
Discussion ensued regarding the surrounding properties and the
location of conservation lands.
Member Anne Hallum asked if County staff had approached the owners
of the parcels located on the north side of SR 40 to determine if
they are willing to participate in the Volusia Forever Program.
Rob Walsh explained that County staff had not approached the owners
on the north side of SR 40. However, County staff has previously
attempted to contact the property owners in this area to participate
in the Volusia Forever Land Acquisition Program, but without
success.
Member John E. Wagner made a motion to accept the SR 40 Middle Haw
Creek Property Application as an eligible project. Member Anne
Hallum seconded the motion that failed by a roll call vote of two
(2) to seven (7), as Resolution 2004 80 requires an affirmative vote
of at least five (5) Members to pass.
Discussion of Group B Properties
1. 1675 Perch Lane (Lake George) – Rob Walsh reminded the Committee
that on June 27, 2007, the property owners made a request to move
their property from the Group B to the Group A List. At that time,
the Committee elected to defer this request, and asked County staff
to put this item on the agenda for the next Committee meeting.
County staff put this item on the July 18, 2007, Agenda for
discussion. He stated that County staff would provide a PowerPoint
presentation with pictures and location maps, and a brief overview
of the property. The property owners would then provide their own
presentation and answer any questions.
Rob Walsh and Randall Sleister provided the following information
about this property: This property consists of approximately 12
acres of developed land with approximately 700 feet of lake frontage
located off Bass Avenue within the Lake George Wildlife Management
Area near the Town of Seville. It is part of the Pine Island
community with access via Bass Avenue. It is near, but not
contiguous to public lands owned by the St. Johns River Water
Management District (District) and the County. An active commercial
greenhouse is located on the property, but the property owners are
willing to remove it. The future land use categories assigned to
this property are Natural Resource Management Area (NRMA),
Environmental Systems Corridor (ESC), and Rural Recreational Area
(RRA). The RRA is applicable to limited areas of intense use located
in remote rural areas along the St. Johns River, many of which are
commonly referred to as fish camps. The zoning classification of
Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) has been assigned to the
property, which allows one (1) unit per acre. The current zoning
would allow twelve (12) units. It meets nine (9) of the 22 total
Site Ranking Criteria. It is dominated by two (2) habitats, upland
mixed forest and floodplain swamp. The canopies of both these
habitats have been thinned, and the understory has been replanted
with bahia grass that is constantly mowed. The edge of the lake is
shallow, which wouldn’t allow access via a power boat. However, Pine
Island Fish Camp, a privately owned facility, has a boat ramp that
could be used as lake access for power boats. Management of the
property would be dependent on how the property is developed,
because it provides opportunities for outdoor recreational
activities.
Steve Oxier, property owner, provided a brief PowerPoint
presentation with pictures and location maps, and a brief overview
of the property, as follows: 1675 Perch Lane is also known as Willow
Point. The Committee unanimously approved this property as eligible
for further consideration and was later ranked as a Group B property
primarily because no funding partner had been identified. The
property is designated on VCOG’s Map A as a property that should be
conserved. The property is approximately 12.3 acres in size with
approximately 700 feet of lake frontage. The property is adjacent to
an area (within 50 feet of the property line) containing the
remnants of an Indian shell midden, which would be of archeological
significance to the area. The property has a wide variety of
wildlife such as snowy egret, ibis, great egrets, blue herons, bald
eagles, ospreys, vultures, turkey, pileated woodpecker, alligators,
and turtles. It also has a variety of flora species such as iris,
pickerel weed, marsh hibiscus and swamp scarlet rosemallow. Paved
road access to the lake would be provided via Bass Avenue. The
existing greenhouse could be used for educational purposes. There is
on-site County water and sewer that could provide facilities for a
small park. This property could be a potential site for a search and
rescue launching facility on Lake George. A petition has been signed
by the property owners on Bass Avenue to show their overwhelming
support of the proposal for County ownership and the creation of a
park. To date, approximately 122 petitioners have signed a petition
of support. This property is on the St. Johns River, an American
Heritage designated river. The property owners are willing sellers
and willing to offer the property at a fair appraised value.
Member Phil Maroney asked if CR 305 (Lake George Road) is paved all
the way to this property.
Steve Oxier replied that CR 305 is paved, but becomes a private road
before it reaches this property and would not provide public access.
He stated that public access could be obtained from Bass Avenue.
Member Anne Hallum suggested submitting an application to Volusia
ECHO as this proposal is for a park that could provide facilities
such as bathrooms, picnic areas, etc.
Member Dwight Lewis asked if property owners on the west side of
this property where among the 122 petitioners.
Steve Oxier explained that two (2) of the property owners on the
west side of this property have signed the petition. He added that
the petition was circulated at the Bass Avenue Home Owners
Association meeting and other events, but had not been taken from
door to door.
Member Dwight Lewis asked if the petitioners were aware that the
only access is via Bass Avenue.
Steve Oxier replied that the petitioners were aware that Bass Avenue
is the only public access.
Member Phil Maroney expressed concerns that there aren’t multiple
public access points as previously presented, lack of connectivity
to other public lands, and potential management issues because it is
isolated.
Randall Sleister stated that this property is more conducive to be
developed as a park, not a restoration project.
Douglas Weaver pointed out that attempts had previously been made to
acquire several parcels to the north of this property without
success. He stated that connectivity is important for large scale
land management.
Member Dwight Lewis asked if the parcel that contains the remnant
Indian shell midden was part of this proposal.
Steve Oxier replied that the parcel containing the remnant Indian
shell midden and their residence was not part of this proposal.
However, the property owners are willing to entertain a proposal
that could include a portion of that parcel.
Member Dwight Lewis expressed a concern that the property owners are
noncommittal as they are “interested” in a fair appraised value, and
would “entertain” adding the portion of the parcel containing the
midden.
Mary Stoughton, public participant and adjoining property owner,
made reference to her letter dated June 28, 2007, which expresses
concerns regarding public access and the intended uses if the
property is acquired by Volusia Forever. She stated that she neither
approves nor opposes the proposal, but wanted to ensure that
accurate information is provided to the Committee. She asked for
clarification regarding the on-site County water and sewer. She
stated that the property owners on CR 305 (Lake George Road) had no
knowledge of the petition and the proposal until the article was
published in the newspaper to “Save Willow Point.”
Member John E. Wagner asked if the local residents would be willing
to sign the petition in support of this proposal to “Save Willow
Point” and create a park.
Mary Stoughton responded that the local residents could be
supportive by signing the petition if they knew the final use of the
property (i.e., park). She again expressed a concern about the final
use and how this could impact the neighborhood.
Member Gerald Feiser asked if a funding partner had been identified
for acquisition and management of the property.
Rob Walsh replied that a funding partner had not been identified for
management of the property. However, the St. Johns River Water
Management District’s (District) staff had been contacted to
determine their interest in being a funding partner for the
acquisition of the property. The District indicated that they are
not interested in being a funding partner. Therefore, there is no
funding partner for the acquisition of this property. He added that
the best use of the property had not been determined at this time.
Member John E. Wagner noted that the use of the property probably
would not be for conservation purposes because it is on the
lakefront and could provide recreational opportunities that would be
more active than Volusia Forever was created to provide.
Discussion ensued regarding the issues of best usage and that this
project may better fit the Volusia ECHO Program’s criteria because
of the potential development of a park.
Member John E. Wagner made a motion to move the 1675 Perch Lane
Property from the Group B to the Group A List. Member Jason McGuirk
seconded the motion that failed by a roll call vote of one (1) to
eight (8).
2. Other Group B Properties –
Rob Walsh explained that County staff would recommend leaving the
remainder of the Group B List as is because there aren’t any changes
in the status of the properties. However, County staff is monitoring
three (3) properties (O’Reilly King, Eagan and Murphy) to determine
if they need to be removed from the list. These properties have
development plans and are under contract to another party that may
not be a willing seller.
Staff Updates
1. Blanchette Property – Douglas Weaver stated that this property is
approximately 7 acres in size located within the boundaries of the
Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve (Preserve). On July 19, 2007, the
County Council is scheduled to make a determination for approval of
the Agreement for Purchase on this property for approximately $1.9
million. A Florida Communities Trust (FCT) application may be
submitted next year based on County staff’s self scoring results.
There is also a potential for partial reimbursement using Florida
Forever funds from the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection’s Division of State Lands as this property is within the
boundaries of the Preserve.
2. Tax Reform – Rob Walsh explained that initially the issues
regarding the property tax reform would not impact the Volusia
Forever Program as it is a voter approved program. However, the
County’s Legal Department has indicated otherwise. The impact would
be minor. The County’s Legal Department has also indicated that the
County would no longer be required to pay CRA fees, which would help
offset the minor decrease in tax revenue.
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 6:00p.m after Member Dwight Lewis made a
motion to adjourn, and Member Anne Hallum seconded the motion that
carried by unanimous voice vote. |