![]() MINUTES
As a Quorum could not be established, Reid Hughes, Chair, called a "workshop" to order at 3:40p.m. Roll Call Reid Hughes, Chair, could not perform an official Roll Call, as a Quorum was not established. However four (4) members were recorded as being in attendance of a "workshop". Approval of Minutes No motion for approval of the Minutes from the March 28, 2002, meeting. Discussion of Policy Issues Chairman Reid Hughes stated that the Committee had established the Volusia Conservation Corridor, Spruce Creek Preserve and Lake George as priority areas. He directed staff, with the authorization of the Committee, to provide the Committee with a list of additional recommended target areas, which follow the Committee’s policies (i.e., resource oriented, adjacent to other public owned lands, eligible for matching funds, and size) at a future meeting. Douglas Weaver stated that staff would be taking a pro-active approach and would be contacting potential applicants within the recommended target areas (i.e., parcels adjacent to the Volusia Conservation Corridor, St. Johns River, other public owned lands, etc.). He stated that staff would be requesting an approval from the Committee to proceed with this pro-active approach. Chairman Reid Hughes explained that obtaining matching funds would be a factor when determining target areas as it is a requirement of the program. He also explained that staff would be able to contact potential partners to determine whether there is the potential for partnering and obtaining matching funds. Member Gordon Kipp requested that Chairman Reid Hughes clarify the meaning of "size." Chairman Reid Hughes explained that the Committee would prefer to review larger sized parcels; however, other factors (i.e., adjacency to other public owned lands, resources, etc.) could determine that a "postage sized" parcel would be a priority. Discussion ensued regarding the solicitation of applicants after Member Gordon Kipp and Member Anne Hallum requested clarification on the issue that the Committee would not be permitted to solicit potential applicants. Rob Walsh stated that the Committee would not be permitted to solicit potential applicants, per the Prohibitions outlined in Resolution 2001-69, Section XI. However, County staff is not restricted from taking a pro-active approach in soliciting potential applicants. He explained that with the limited amount of funds available to purchase properties, staff would recommend that a concerted effort be made on specific target areas to get the fullest use of the limited funds. He also explained the process as follows: staff would contact the property owner, explain the Volusia Forever Land Acquisition program, and determine if the property owner would be willing to participate in the program. If the property owner would not be willing to participate in the program, staff would continue with the search for willing applicants. The Committee agreed with staff’s recommendation to take a pro-active approach; however, an official motion could not be made, as there was not a quorum. Chairman Reid Hughes recommended that the Committee contact staff with any recommendations or suggestions for areas to solicit or target as a priority area. Discussion of Small Lot Acquisition Rob Walsh presented a map depicting the areas throughout the County that are the major antiquated, platted subdivisions (Cape Atlantic Estates, University Highlands, Hamilton Heights, Park Villas, and Davis Park) without infra-structure and are primarily wetlands. He explained that the current building and zoning regulations would make it difficult for a landowner to obtain the permits necessary for development. The County has been acquiring smaller lots through land donations, tax sales, and purchases utilizing wetlands mitigation funds that were created through the wetlands mitigation ordinance. With the creation of the wetlands ordinance, the County created a funding source (approximately $10,000/year) to purchase the smaller lots. The County collects fees from developers who impact wetlands, which pays for the damages caused by their development. The County in turn utilizes those funds to purchase significant wetlands that are protected and can’t be built upon. Staff has proposed to supplement the wetlands funds with Volusia Forever funds (2% of the annual funds raised by Volusia Forever). Again, this would permit staff to take a pro-active approach in obtaining property within an area that has been targeted as a priority. Cape Atlantic Estates was recommended for the initial attempt by staff, as the SJRWMD is in the process of acquiring the Hart Cattle Company property. Staff could focus on property in and around this area to fill in the holes. Staff doesn’t want to create a market where a market doesn’t exist. These are lands that have very low economic value, difficult to obtain a building permit, no facilities or structures, and low development pressures. The small lot acquisition program would be a staff intensive program and a supplement to the acquisition of larger properties, which have a significant ecological value. Staff would provide a brief layout of potential areas considered as target areas. Douglas Weaver stated that the County would not be doing surveys or appraisals on these small lot acquisitions in order to keep the costs to a minimum. He explained that there could be some risk involved by not doing the surveys. Chairman Reid Hughes requested that staff’s request for authorization to proceed with the small lot acquisition program and authorization to utilize 2% of the Volusia Forever funds for small lot acquisition be placed on the Agenda for the June 19, 2002, meeting. He directed staff to continue with the pro-active approach and work with the SJRWMD. Discussion of Bonding Chairman Reid Hughes stated that bonding may become necessary with staff taking a pro-active approach in acquiring land and the limited amount of available funds for all the proposed acquisitions. He explained that even though the concept of the Volusia Forever Land Acquisition program is to "pay as you go", this would provide an opportunity to address and express the need for bonding to the County Council. Update on May 2, 2002, County Council Meeting Rob Walsh stated that the County Council approved the Committee’s 1st cycle ranking recommendations as follows without any changes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||