back to home page

MINUTES
VOLUSIA FOREVER ADVISORY COMMITTEE

Wednesday, July 24, 2001
3:00p.m. - 5:00p.m.
Volusia County Sheriff’s Office Training Facility
3901 Tiger Bay Road, Daytona Beach, FL 32124

Approved 08/15/01

Board Members in Attendance

Also in Attendance

Reid Hughes, Chair
Dennis Bayer, Vice Chair
Gordon Kipp
Doug Daniels
Anne Hallum

Bill Gardner 
Bob Buettgens
Rob Walsh 
Dinah Pulver
Randall Sleister 
Ray Bunton
Jeanette Munson 

Deanna Kinnard
Jamie Seaman 
Clay Henderson
Doug Weaver 
Dot Moore
James E. Ward

Meeting Called to Order

Reid Hughes, Chair, called the meeting to order at 3:05p.m.

Roll Call

Reid Hughes, Chair, instructed the Recording Secretary to call the roll, in which five (5) Members were present to establish a Quorum.

Approval of Minutes

There was no motion for approval of the July 11, 2001, minutes.

Discussion of SJRWMD Land Acquisition Program

Ray Bunton, Director of the Division of Land Acquisition, SJRWMD, presented a map of Volusia County Conservation Lands and explained what the different areas of color represented (i.e., green – public ownership (state, federal or local); red – potential acquisition areas identified by SJRWMD; yellow – SJRWMD ownership; and rust – municipal boundaries). He further explained that the big focus is on the conservation/recreation land project (CARL Project) which is the Volusia Conservation Corridor. This project is of very high importance to SJRWMD because of its water resource protection, which could be surface water, ground water for drinking purposes; wildlife corridor protection; public recreation and use; etc. SJRWMD has only been able to buy one (1) 417 acre parcel. He described some of the other projects SJRWMD has been and are currently working on, such as Lake George out parcels, south side of Lake Ashby and the Ranier project. The major problem SJRWMD has faced is sellers with unrealistic asking prices, especially with the Hwy. 44 corridor. He described SJRWMD’s acquisition program as a "willing seller" program and the type of lands/projects SJRWMD would acquire (i.e., water resource, environmentally sensitive, etc.). He explained that SJRWMD does not utilize the power of condemnation except for flood protection and water storage. He expressed that the "willing seller" and the willingness to work with appraisals are key to any land acquisition program. Other obstacles will be developers, as they are not restricted by funding and/or other procedures.

Chairman Reid Hughes explained that patience would be important in the process of land acquisition along with the necessity to work with the Comprehensive Plan.

Discussion ensued with regards to zoning, rezoning and how this could effect the land acquisition process, specifically in regards to the Volusia Conservation Corridor.

Doug Weaver explained that the Comprehensive Plan for Volusia County was established in 1990, and the Zoning for the County was conformed to the Comprehensive Plan in 1992 (east side) and 1994 (west side). Therefore, Volusia County has established consistency with Zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. He explained that a Comprehensive Plan amendment would be necessary in most cases to obtain the type of density that is desired.

Chairman Reid Hughes expressed the importance of informing the County Council of the need to protect the Volusia Conservation Corridor from roads and development impacts. He further explained that the corridor is a water recharge area, which will greatly effect the aquifer if it is not protected.

Rob Walsh introduced Deanna Kinnard, who assisted with Alachua County’s Land Acquisition Program.

Deanna Kinnard explained that Alachua County underwent a process similar to Volusia County’s where the bonding issue was addressed and a ranking/rating criteria was developed. She stressed the importance of prioritizing the projects, and to not overlook projects just because they did not rank as Number 1 or Number 2. She recommended utilizing common sense and staff reports when making decisions on which projects to recommend for acquisition.

After Chairman Reid Hughes requested that staff draft a letter for his signature, Member Doug Daniels made a motion creating a "formal request" to the PLDRC and County Council to consider the road and development impacts on the Volusia Conservation Corridor before issuing development orders thereby protecting said corridor. Member Anne Hallum seconded the motion that carried unanimously by voice vote.

Discussion of Final Application Form

Chairman Reid Hughes requested approval of the "Final" Land Acquisition Program Application form.

Doug Weaver recommended changing the "Owner’s Authorized Representative" form by deleting "to the Volusia Forever Advisory Committee." He also recommended changing "Authorization to Enter Property" by adding Letter E, which would read: Environmental assessments.

Member Gordon Kipp made a motion to approve the Land Acquisition Program Application, as amended. Member Dennis Bayer seconded the motion that carried unanimously by voice vote.

Discussion of Letter to County Council

Chairman Reid Hughes presented the letter addressed to the Chair of the County Council (Dwight D. Lewis), which requests for assistance in promoting the Volusia Conservation Corridor from the "B" list to the "A" list.

Discussion ensued with regards to whom the letter should be addressed to, and to include issues such as the aquifer, endangered species, etc.

Member Dennis Bayer recommended specifying whom the mobilization support needs to be targeted toward.

Members Dennis Bayer and Gordon Kipp recommended sending/addressing the letter to the Acquisition and Restoration Council.

Chairman Reid Hughes recommended addressing the issue of the project’s current ranking ("B" list) and the necessity for the project to be returned to the "A" list. He further recommended an addition where the County Council calls for broad public support from elected officials, cities, etc.

Member Gordon Kipp made a motion to prepare the letter to County Council, as amended. Member Dennis Bayer seconded the motion that carried unanimously by voice vote.

Discussion and Approval of Change to Meeting Dates

Chairman Reid Hughes informed the Committee that the meeting dates would be changed to the 1st and 3rd Wednesday of every month starting on August 15, 2001, thereby avoiding any scheduling conflicts with the Volusia ECHO meetings. The time would remain the same, 3:00p.m. – 5:00p.m. The meeting place would be changed to the VOTRAN Facility on Big Tree Road in South Daytona for the first three meetings (08/15/01, 09/05/01 and 09/19/01). The Committee was advised that staff would update them with meeting place(s) for the remaining meetings.

Member Doug Daniels made a motion to adopt the change in meeting dates (1st and 3rd Wednesday of every month). Member Anne Hallum seconded the motion that carried unanimously by voice vote.

Rob Walsh informed the Committee that a new meeting schedule would be provided in the next agenda package.

Discussion ensued with regards to the County Council meeting on August 9, 2001, with the August 8, 2001, joint meeting with Volusia Forever and ECHO being postponed until after this meeting of the County Council. Jamie Seaman explained that the County Council would be clarifying Volusia Forever and ECHO’s roles with regards to which Committee is to fund what type of projects (i.e., beach access, improvements). She further explained that County Council developed Resolution 2000-155 based on the Florida Forever Statutes, which were provided to the Committee.

Sub-Committee Status Report on Resolution-01

Member Doug Daniels, Chairman of the Sub-Committee, presented the Sub-Committee’s "Draft" Resolution-01, which was created after the meeting on Friday, July 20, 2001. He referenced the following sections of Resolution 2000-155 and expressed the need to follow closely to this document:

Page 3, Sub-Paragraph B, which explains what the mill is to be used for (acquisition of water resource and environmentally sensitive land for conservation and public use);

Ballot Summary, Page 5, which broadens the usage to include improvements and outdoor recreation. He explained that the Ballot Summary (per Florida Statute 161) is simply a summary of what you are voting on and should not be considered when determining what the Committee is being charged with doing.

Page 8, Section X, Policies and Procedures, 2nd sentence (Each Project must state a public purpose for the restoration, conservation, or preservation of environmentally sensitive land and water areas and for providing public use opportunities), which again states and emphasizes the type of land as water resource and environmentally sensitive.

Page 8, Section XI, Acquisition Goals, which already provides a list of goals. He expressed the need to utilize what has already been approved/adopted and what is best suited for the County.

He explained that additions were bolded and the omissions/deletions where lined through. He further explained and reviewed some of the changes as follows:

Page 1 – addition of "Water Resource Protection and Outdoor Recreation" – incorporated per Resolution 2000-155 (water resource) and broadened to include outdoor recreation.

Page 4 – Section 2 – Initial Authorization of Bonds - addition of "and in subsequent years the County Council may authorize additional series of bonds." This was added to address the issue of funding of current projects and the issue of "pay as you go." He recommended further discussion with the County Council.

He explained that throughout the remainder of the document various areas were broadened to best reflect the intent of Resolution 2000-155, and to fall in line with State statutes and guidelines.

He explained that the issue of Ranking Criteria needed to be addressed and expressed concerns with a points system. He further explained that "Primary and Enhancement" criteria were developed to better follow Resolution 2000-155, which focuses initially on "water resource and environmentally sensitive" lands as the primary criteria and any other features would be enhancements.

Discussion ensued with regards to Resolution 2000-155. Jamie Seaman explained that Resolution 2000-155 was developed, based on County Council directions, with the intent to mimic the Florida Forever Act as much as possible and it addresses the many different types of properties. The County Council’s biggest concern was it did not want active recreation but they did want resource based recreation. She explained that County Council’s intent is to include historical and archeological lands, and that the Committee should not loose sight of this intent. She referenced Florida Statutes 253.034, 253.7825, 259.101, and 259.105, which were provided to the Committee for reference so they could better understand how Resolution 2000-155 was developed and what is the intent of the County Council. These Statues also define the difference between active recreation and resource based recreation. She expressed the need for clarification from the County Council on issues of intent regarding historical and archeological lands.

Chairman Reid Hughes recommended that the Sub-Committee meet to refine Resolution-01 taking into consideration all the issues and intents.

Member Dennis Bayer recommended incorporating language which reflects the intent with regards to "resource based recreation". He agreed with Member Doug Daniels regarding the points value. He presented the question, "Does every land acquisition transaction have to be matched by another funding mechanism?"

Jamie Seaman explained that it is the intent to utilize matching funds in all land acquisition transactions. She referenced Section X, Policies and Procedures, Page 8 of Resolution 2000-155, which states: "it is the intent of the program to achieve maximum impact by partnering with other entities through award or acceptance of grants, joint projects and other cooperative efforts."

Member Dennis Bayer expressed the need to be flexible on this issue to avoid any exclusion of potential acquisitions.

Member Doug Daniels explained the importance of developing guidelines, utilizing staff reports and creating a process with flexibility.

Chairman Reid Hughes recommended that the Sub-Committee meet to resolve and address issues such as matching funds, outdoor recreation, ranking criteria, etc.

Member Doug Daniels agreed that the Sub-Committee would meet again to resolve remaining issues and to present a finalized/revised Resolution-01 to the Committee at the August 15, 2001, meeting.

Discussion Topics for Next Meeting (August 15, 2001)

Chairman Reid Hughes requested the following to be topics:

Sub-Committee Status Report on Resolution-01

Approval of July 11, 2001, Minutes

Adjournment

Meeting adjourned at 5:00p.m.

back to home page

 Public information produced by Volusia County Government